October 22nd, 2008 - Posted in filosofeggiando, real-life, jokes | 
From my balcony you can see a small garden condominium, a language of grass nell'asfalto Palazzone. On the concrete is an old wooden kennel march of time, within a beautiful dog of medium size, half white and half black with the court and zampino grassottelle. It has a behavior that in the eyes of someone may seem masochistic, at least strange, took the flight from inside the pet carrier and runs away. His problem is a limit, ending his racing embossed with the body forward and striped sull'asfalto can make just a few meters before the chain strangoli suddenly, it all back spelar how we test. His reality is the radius of the chain that has the neck, wants to break the limit which prevents him from running away, passing his day trying to do it, do not care if the strip against the asphalt and it hurts. Those who pass the looks and smiling occasionally hear: "oh, that dog looks silly." That dog is not only not stupid, in all likelihood is the most intelligent dog I have ever seen. Most dogs chained stà quietly, not him, wants to go further and see what is behind quell'angolo, where the race seems. This is life, you can not hold it in chains. In that attempt apparently obsessive and stupid is all the evidence to exist, the achievement of happiness through the breaking of a limit. If you make someone wearing a chain is your duty to break it, no matter what kind of chain is or what you might cost, it is for life to go further. I took a screwdriver and have loosened the screws holding the chain, this morning broke his limit.
October 13th, 2008 - Posted in filosofeggiando, information, mathematics, politics, special, history, video | 
The mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi public in 2005 this imaginary interview to the famous dictator, to whom the Board has not yet read it. There is no revisionism in these lines, the goal is the author highlight the subtle relativism afflicting modern society.
Adolf Hitler was born in Austria on April 20 1889, and devoted his life to the creation of politically exposed in 1924 in Mein Kampf, "My Battle", written in prison after a failed attempt of coup d'etat. His reign of terror could legally begin in 1933, thanks to 44% of the votes of the National Socialist Party, and 8% of the Nationalist Party (20.5 million in total), obtained in the elections: a demonstration of the paradox that a dictator can also get to power democratically .
The expansion of the Third Reich began in 1938 with the annexation of Austria, and reached its maximum extension from North Cape to the Sahara, and from Normandy to the Caspian. The contraction began in 1942 with the defeat of Stalingrad and El Alamein, and ended on 9 May 1945 with the entry of the Russians in Berlin. Shortly before, on April 30, Hitler had killed with a shot gun in his bunker.
Sixty years later, while the world is organizing a Fourth Reich ranging from the United States to the Mediterranean, we spoke of the bloody Third vegetarian who has commanded for twelve years.
Furer, after the end of the Second World War his name has become synonymous with evil. What do you think?
History is always written by the victors, and the well is what is on their side. If we had won we would be a synonym for evil became the names of Churchill and Roosevelt.
Do you not think that there are objective reasons, besides the defeat? Stalin war was won, yet even his name has become synonymous with evil.
Millions of people have not thought so, on Stalin, before and after the war: how many Russians have cried when he died? I'm afraid you do not know much nor Stalinism, or Nazism, apart from what Ammann Ministries of Propaganda, his country and what the boss.
Ministries of Propaganda? And what would be our Goebbels?
To speak in terms that you can understand, if we had inhuman totalitarianism of the 1984 Orwell, yours is now totalitarianism with a human face of the new World of Huxley. Its Ministries of Propaganda are therefore cinema and television: If you want to find the new Goebbels, among them trying Spielberg and Zeffirelli, or between Murdoch and Berlusconi.
What he wanted to suggest, among other things, with that country that commands us? "What Italy would be a colony of the United States?
It is not, perhaps? Since you were occupied in 1944, there are more liberated. To date there are 125 bases and 35,000 U.S. troops in Italy: is this independence? In Germany, then we are even worse. What you call liberation, was only for the military to another, less produced but no less effective.
Will not deny, however, that Nazism was guilty of crimes against humanity never before seen.
Ah, yes? And what?
First, the extermination of six million Jews.
Do not say jerks. My model for solving the Jewish problem was the way in which the United States had resolved a similar problem in India: a scientific and systematic genocide of eighteen million native who lived in North America. How many Indians remain in the United States today? A few hundred, kept in reserve as the bison. And how many Jews remain in the world? Million, and have even been a whole for them, which, among other things, is showing that he had learned our lesson on how to deal with ethnic minorities.
She is without a God!
Without the God of the Jews, perhaps. But you had not perhaps been Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, saying that "all the murderers of the Holocaust were Christians, and the Nazi not appeared out of nowhere, but had deep roots in a tradition inseparable from the past of Christian Europe "? Not without reason my SS wore wrote Gott mit uns on the belt buckle.
The Church certainly do not think so!
But if, when Rolf Hochhuth broke the spell with the vicar in 1963, there is talk that the silence of Pius XII against what you call Holocaust! And then, she has not read my Mein Kampf, which I imagine is not easy to find in your library: If he had done, but these countries the project for the triumph of Nazism was modeled on the tenacious adherence to dogma and on fanatica intolerance that characterized the history of the Catholic Church.
In any case, be enough to condemn the contempt for human life of innocent civilians who have proved during the war.
This is to go tell the people of Hamburg and Dresden, which have poured the "fire storms" that have killed one million. Or those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, three hundred thousand of whom were incinerated by two atomic bombs: none propaganda can erase the fact that the "bad" Nazis did not build these weapons of mass destruction, while the "good" the United States have not only built, but use!
At least, do not want to deny his abhorrent political eugenics.
Why should I ever deny it? It was a means to achieve the purity of the breed. But I do not understand what is abhorrent to: my Act of 1933, for the prevention of hereditary defects, was explicitly based on the U.S. model of Harry Laughlin, who gave us a reason why an honorary degree in 1936 in Heidelberg. I know you, that the first law for the sterilization of criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists "was promulgated in 1907 dall'Indiana? What was later imitated by some thirty U.S. states, and in 1927 declared constitutional by the Supreme Court? That in the'30s were sterilized 60,000 individuals in the United States, half of them in California alone? And that in the'50s, after the war, 50,000 homosexuals were castrated?
Do not want to say that the United States, the melting pot, are a racist country!
She is a naive! According to her, against what Martin Luther King showed, even in the'60s? And who wrote The passage of the Great Race in 1916?
Who?
Madison Grant, a friend of Theodore Roosevelt. When the book was translated into German, the Mandai an enthusiastic letter, of which he was very pleased. And speaking of Roosevelt, do not forget that Pierre van der Berghe, a scholar of race, put together with me and Hendrik Verwoerd, the architect of 'South African apartheid, racism in the Trinity of the twentieth century.
At this rate, come to say that the United States were also a Nazi!
The United States could not have followed the Nazis because they preceded and inspired. Basically, we wanted either one: how singing my SS, Morgen die ganze Welt. Unfortunately, the world was almost entirely in the hands of colonial powers, and we take away by force. The "evil" of which we have accused was all here: they want to do what they had done to others. We have failed, but the U.S. is carrying out what was our real project: the global domain (military , Political and economic) of the planet.
E 'This, then, the legacy of Nazism?
He said Otto Dietrich zur Linde, the day before his execution, issued in an Borges of Argentina, was published under the title Deutsches Requiem: Nazism was an ideology as well, that the only way to defeat was to embrace it. We did not want violence dominate the world, and our aim has been fully achieved. We have lived and died not in vain.
Street: Milky Way
